/-->Naturalism (chance) --> Darwin Science(Newton) --> Metaphysics (machine) \-->Natural Theology (design) --> CreationThe debate often came down to deist design versus atheist chance. In religious circles, this debate came to be called "apologetics", which unfortunately sounded and acted a lot like apologizing. Many examples of well meant attempts to rationalize Christianity exist, such as Josh McDowell's "Evidence that Demands a Verdict", and most were doomed to failure. The genre has nearly petered out with some late modernist attempts such as Bishop Spong who have apologized Christianity into nothingness. The fundamental problem with all these "modern" apologetics is their commitment to "newtonian" or naturalist metaphysics. That is, the goal of apologetics was seen as "finding incontrovertible evidences of God in Nature". In opposition, then, the goal of atheism / agnosticism was seen as "determined skepticism", or finding reasons to reject evidence. It was such an even match that for 173 years, from Newton's 1686 Principia to Darwin's 1859 Origin, Deism flourished as a philosophy of open-minded tolerance to both sides.
atomist | organic / magic |
lifeless atoms | souls, life |
Newton mechanism | Aristotle purpose |
force by collisions | action at a distance |
particles mediate | fields mediate |
ether permeates space | Magnetism, electricity |
sound waves emanate | influences, auras |
mind is a collection | mind, will, consciousness |
of experiences | are states of being |
spontaneous generation | life begets life |
light is a particle | light is a wave |